Rebol Talk Forum  |  Licensing and Distribution  |  General discussions  |  Topic: REBOL inside LInux distributions
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: REBOL inside LInux distributions  (Read 2219 times)
carloslorenz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 9


View Profile
REBOL inside LInux distributions
« on: July 08, 2004, 07:40:13 AM »

I guess REBOL Technologies could have a great chance to see their products much more used around the world if REBOL/Core and REBOL/View could be regular packages of Linux distributions.

Here in Brazil, lots of people are moving their desktop OS from Windows XP to Linux because of the great gonvernment support on Free Software (see http://www.softwarelivre.org.br).

These people do not know REBOL but they start writting Python programs, because Python comes with Linux.

There are very good Linux distributions in Brazil such as Conectiva http://www.conectiva.com.br [
and Kurumin http://www.kurumin.com.br that could bring REBOL to the people.

Of course in US and Europe and other parts of the world the scenario is the same so why RT people do not think about it?
« Last Edit: July 08, 2004, 07:45:36 AM by carloslorenz » Logged
CarlRead
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 105


View Profile
REBOL inside LInux distributions
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2004, 12:55:11 AM »

Core was on a distribution of Red Hat quite a while back, but for whatever reason, it or View hasn't been on Linux distributions since.  (As far as I know.)

My feeling would be that unless REBOL goes open-source it won't ever be a good fit for Linux distributions.  Pity.
Logged

- Carl Read
Guest_rebolnuts
Guest


Email
REBOL inside LInux distributions
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2004, 08:14:23 AM »

Red hat can be distributed by anybody no ? So why wouldn't be any need that rebol goes open source: it can just be packaged with RED hat per se.
Logged
G
Guest


Email
REBOL inside LInux distributions
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2004, 03:13:06 PM »

And what if OpenBSD (to be released next week) contained rebol?
Logged
CarlRead
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 105


View Profile
REBOL inside LInux distributions
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2004, 03:30:08 PM »

Open-sourcers tend to say "I don't want no stinking propriety software on my machine", and that extends to their Linux distributions.  REBOL's closed-source, hence it's an unknown, hence it'd look out of place if not downright suspicious if it was the only closed-source bit of software in a distro.
Logged

- Carl Read
Guest
Guest


Email
REBOL inside LInux distributions
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2004, 07:09:24 PM »

Have there been any discussions about making REBOL/Core open source?

Are there any open source REBOL clones out there?

I can't help but notice that these forums are not very active...  Maybe some Open Source distribution would revitalize the REBOL community.
Logged
CarlRead
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 105


View Profile
REBOL inside LInux distributions
« Reply #6 on: November 22, 2004, 10:48:22 PM »

These forums are not the primary way REBOL coders communicate, which is why they don't seem too active.  I gather the REBOL World on AltMe (see: http://www.altme.com/ ) is the most active place, (I don't use it so can't really say), with the official REBOL mailing list  (see: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/ml-index.r ) being the other prime means of communication.

As to open-sourcing REBOL, look under "O" in the mailing list archive for a couple of threads on the subject, plus these two posts by Carl Sassenrath to his blog...

http://www.rebol.net/blog/carl-041004.html#section-2

http://www.rebol.net/blog/carl-041011.html#section-13

may be of interest to you as well.

There's an attempt at a clone (here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/r-sharp ) but I suspect the project's stalled - just two developers with the last file released on September 8, 2003.
 
Logged

- Carl Read
Guest
Guest


Email
REBOL inside LInux distributions
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2005, 11:49:08 AM »

The problem is that languages are fundamentally different than other technologies.  It is much easier to switch to a new editor, email program, or web browser, than it is to switch to a new programming language.  I suspect that most Linux users wouldn't like the idea of trusting the future of their applications to the good will of Rebol Technologies.  Especially if they are writing Open Source software, they will want to build it on an Open Source base.  This sort of thing can get a language lots of exposure, like what Zope did for Python.

Unfortunately, I suspect that the only people who will appreciate the power of dialecting without experiencing it are Lisp hackers, and they already have clisp, cmucl, and sbcl.  Most Perl or Python programmers won't see the advantage in Rebol unless they are able to try it out, and they won't see the point in doing that unless it is Open Source.  The Lisp hackers already have macros and Open Source implementations.

If we don't steal programmers from other languages, the other option is to get new programmers by having Rebol be their first language.  How can this be accomplished?  Get CS departments to use it (Pascal, Scheme)?  Create lots of hype in the media (Java)?  Have it be the only language that comes with their new computer (old BASIC)?

Where are we supposed to find new Rebol programmers?
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
Rebol Talk Forum  |  Licensing and Distribution  |  General discussions  |  Topic: REBOL inside LInux distributions
Jump to:  

  
Quick Search...

Advanced search
  
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 30, 2008, 07:05:34 PM
Username: Password: Session Length:
  

News: 01-09-08

Alpha version of REBOL 3 has been released!


  
2243 Posts in 587 Topics by 2012 Members
Latest Member: Rsfezgpe

  Rebol Talk Forum | Powered by SMF 1.0.9.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.

RT design by Defiant Pc